Hi Jeremy Please excuse my labouring the point, but I am trying to find the best way to address the issue raised by Stephen Kimmel in the previous post without interfering with the essential features of TW.
Automatic linking of CamelCase links to non-existent tiddlers is a core > part of the wiki way. The idea is to be able to write links to tiddlers > before you go back and fill in the references. The missing tiddlers tab > ends up being a "todo list" that is dynamically built from the tiddlers > that have been referenced but not filled in. > Links to 'missing tiddlers' are easily bracketed with double boxes for this purpose, which has the added advantage that non CamelCase titles may be used in this way. Linking to 'missing tiddlers' is certainly a core part of the wiki way, but automatic linking of CamelCase forms to 'missing tiddlers' appears to have a downside that outweighs the advantages. Having to place brackets around CamelCase titles in the few instances when these tiddlers are non-existent at the time appears to be a small price to pay for avoiding the problems of automatic linking of all CamelCase forms. The only downside of suppressing automatic linking of CamelCase to 'missing tiddlers' appears to be that a few CamelCase strings will not function as links until the browser is refreshed? This might present a theoretical travesty but in practice I don't think many users would find this much of a problem. regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
