Hi Jeremy
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 2:28:06 PM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote:
>
> Hi Matabele, Stephan
>
> It's not the trailing tags that result in the spurious blank lines. It's
> the browsers default CSS.
>
I'm still confused -- why then when I write:
<dl>
<dd>some text</dd>
<dd><dd>some text</dd></dd>
<dd><dd><dd>some text</dd></dd></dd>
</dl>
-- is the output different to:
:some text
::some text
:::some text
In the second case, it appears to be extra trailing </dl> tags that cause
the spurious blank lines.
This is not the usage case that I encounter most often -- what I would like
to write is:
Some text
:some text
:some text
:some text
Some text
:some text
:some text
:some text
-- and get this:
Some text
some text
some text
some text
Some text
some text
some text
some text
-- which works if I write:
<dl>
Some text
<dd>some text</dd>
<dd>some text</dd>
<dd>some text</dd>
</dl>
<dl>
Some text
<dd>some text</dd>
<dd>some text</dd>
<dd>some text</dd>
</dl>
Perhaps a better approach would be to introduce a completely different form
unrelated to the syntax for definition blocks, perhaps making use of a
leading 'minus' to indicate an indent:
Some text
- some text
- some text
-- some text
-- rendered as:
Some text
some text
some text
some text
This might also be used in cases such as:
- THE first line of this paragraph is indented
regards
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
