On Wednesday, 9 July 2014 14:05:53 UTC+1, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 11:47:52 AM UTC+1, 9600 wrote: >> >> I'd like to set up multi-user TiddlyWiki hosting on my own server and >> would appreciate some advice as to which route I should take. This will be >> mainly for organising my own stuff, but I'd also like the ability to create >> additional "secure" wiki instances for customers/projects. I quite fancy >> using TiddlyWiki 5, and beyond straightforward wikis there is the >> possibility that I might want to create simple apps, e.g. for managing >> small scale manufacturing, tracking inventory and tasks etc. >> > > Small scale manufacturing sounds very steampunk to me! ;) >
Hah! Hoping to get a discount on a top hat festooned with brass cogs, eh? If you want to use TW5 then tiddlywebwiki won't do the trick, it produces > TWC. Not only that, but it is also getting a bit behind the curve on the > best ways to manage content (the new ways are more dynamic with more effort > on the client side) and it no longer has built in support for server-side > rendering (the WikklyText package on which server-side rendering depended > is no longer being maintained) which impacts the quality of Atom feeds and > search results. > > With a bit of work it is relatively straightforward to use TW5 with just > TiddlyWeb. You need to create appropriate recipes and use the tank edition > of tw5 (which has the tiddlywebadaptor built in) but otherwise it ought to > "just work". What you would get by using Tank is more effective policy > management, friendlier UI, etc. However that comes at the cost of their > being some currently built in dependencies that you might not want in your > own installation: auth via oath2 to github, facebook or google; storage of > binary tiddlers in S3. Both of these things could be made optional, but are > not currently. > I think I'd like to try setting up Tank. oauth2 dependency sounds fine for now and I'm guessing other auth methods could be added later if need, e.g. local password db. Although I wouldn't fancy having to set up S3. Could a simple filesystem store, or even Git repo, be configured? > There's a lot of stuff in the way Tank is put together, especially under > the covers, that I guess would be considered state of TiddlyWeb art. On the > surface it looks like a nice little markdown-based wiki but there's a good > deal more going on. > I'm happy to provide help/input in assembling whatever bits and pieces turn > out to be right for you. > Much appreciated, thanks! Thoughts on above and where I'd start? Cheers, Andrew -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
