On Saturday, July 12, 2014 10:27:21 PM UTC-7, CB wrote: > > I have been using tiddly wiki for various things and addition of image > support has made it too attractive to not use the feature. However, It has > been bothering me if I should start including high-resolution image in TW5 > or not. Looking around I found this: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/TiddlyWiki/PpJsdJr99n8/dt8p8U3z9G8J > > It seems that TW5 will start getting slower after 60mb or so. I understand > that I can always use external links to image for larger applications. But, > I have been wondering about what is the use-case for which image support > has been designed? >
Storing images "internally" (i.e., as tiddlers within the document), provides the ability to share a standalone, single-file version of TW5. As you've noted, this can include storage of very large images. However, I believe that the primary use-case of internally stored images is for *small* images used as embedded icons, logos, and textures for CSS styling. enjoy, -e Eric Shulman TiddlyTools / ELS Design Studios YOUR DONATIONS ARE VERY IMPORTANT! HELP ME TO HELP YOU - MAKE A CONTRIBUTION TO MY "TIP JAR"... http://TiddlyTools.github.com/fundraising.html#MakeADonation Professional TiddlyWiki Consulting Services... Analysis, Design, and Custom Solutions: http://www.TiddlyTools.com/#Contact -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
