Hi, Thanks to everybody for your kind words. I'm pleased you like it.
I started writing some documentation. @Jeremy A screencast might be helpful too. Yes, good idea. It would be great if you have a chance to join the TW hangout on a Tuesday, > too. Thanks for the invitation. I've been teaching past Tuesday. Maybe when I release an empty version with a little bit more documentation. @Matabele Looking really polished -- really like your nested 'Contents' tab -- I shall > have to steal it :-) I would be honored (and I stole your plugins .-) I've never seen so many <$setfield> widgets -- glad to see that the stacked > widgets still function when utilised to this extent -- a really good test. My tiddlywiki wouldn't make sense without your wonderful plugins; they ease a lot the creation of new contents. Thanks a lot for that. @David Gifford I am wondering if something this complex will slow down as you add a > moderate bit of data to it. I am wondering too. Its a lot of transclusions and a lot of <$list> widgets. @Andrew Lister Like the system of comments on tiddlers - could be useful for putting > lecture slides or outlines in tiddler, then lecture notes in comment. Good idea. I would like to see the TalkyTalky features (theme, background color for tiddlers) merged into the default tw5 in order to use it as a powerpoint alternative. @oldvic20 Excellent job, a remarkable evolution from your work in tesis Thanks. Now I need to pass the data from one to other, and its a lot of work. @cangaroo joe I'm very interested in using the empty version of your promising project. Next week, maybe. First I need to clean things and add some documentation. @Mark Brown I love the contents tab too. How does it work? And how deep can it go? Is > it infinitely recursive? I use $:/_ViewTemplate/tabs to display the bottom tabs. The list of tabs to display for a certain tiddler is determined by the field "tabs" of that tiddler (the value of this field points to the tiddler $:/_tabs where the lists actually are). To see the real contents of the tabs, look for $:/_tab/something tiddlers. At the moment, it's not recursive, but it could be. How deep can it go? As deep as you want. But for me, I don't think that more than two or three levels deep are useful or meaningful. Maybe there's other use cases where deeper recursiveness would be useful. Thanks again everybody, Alberto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

