Hi,

Thanks to everybody for your kind words. I'm pleased you like it.

I started writing some documentation.


@Jeremy

A screencast might be helpful too. 


Yes, good idea. 

It would be great if you have a chance to join the TW hangout on a Tuesday, 
> too.


Thanks for the invitation. I've been teaching past Tuesday. Maybe when I 
release an empty version with a little bit more documentation. 



@Matabele

Looking really polished -- really like your nested 'Contents' tab -- I shall 
> have to steal it :-)


I would be honored (and I stole your plugins .-)

I've never seen so many <$setfield> widgets -- glad to see that the stacked 
> widgets still function when utilised to this extent -- a really good test.


My tiddlywiki wouldn't make sense without your wonderful plugins; they ease 
a lot the creation of new contents. Thanks a lot for that.



@David Gifford

I am wondering if something this complex will slow down as you add a 
> moderate bit of data to it.


I am wondering too. Its a lot of transclusions and a lot of <$list> 
widgets. 



@Andrew Lister

Like the system of comments on tiddlers - could be useful for putting 
> lecture slides or outlines in tiddler, then lecture notes in comment.


Good idea. I would like to see the TalkyTalky features (theme, background 
color for tiddlers) merged into the default tw5 in order to use it as a 
powerpoint alternative.



@oldvic20

Excellent job, a remarkable evolution from your work in tesis


Thanks. Now I need to pass the data from one to other, and its a lot of 
work.


 @cangaroo joe

I'm very interested in using the empty version of your promising project.  


Next week, maybe. First I need to clean things and add some documentation.


@Mark Brown

I love the contents tab too. How does it work? And how deep can it go? Is 
> it infinitely recursive?


I use $:/_ViewTemplate/tabs to display the bottom tabs. The list of tabs to 
display for a certain tiddler is determined by the field "tabs" of that 
tiddler (the value of this field points to the tiddler $:/_tabs where the 
lists actually are). To see the real contents of the tabs, look for 
$:/_tab/something tiddlers.

At the moment, it's not recursive, but it could be. How deep can it go? As 
deep as you want. But for me, I don't think that more than two or three 
levels deep are useful or meaningful. Maybe there's other use cases where 
deeper recursiveness would be useful.



Thanks again everybody,

Alberto


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to