Hi Philip Still a random filter(s) might be used on lists, yes? One could think of > four such filters, pick N at random, remove N at random, pick N at random > with replacement, and randomize . >
There are some subtle assumptions that filter execution is deterministic (ie, a given filter string will evaluate to the same list every time it is executed in the context of the same tiddler store values). For example, the list widget re-evaluates the filter each time it is refreshed, and detects changes to the list. If there were a randomising filter operator then the filter would be deemed to have changed every time, leading to continuous repeated refreshing of the list widget content. Best wishes Jeremy. -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
