Hi Alex > Could each edge be a tiddler? > > The type of edge could be "depends on" etc. but the tiddler itself would > detail the complexities of that dependancy. In a complex system the > interweaving of dependancies is a key aspect - one which mind mapping > software does not cater for. > > Because I am a huge fan of the semantic web, ontologies and rdf triples (where edges may be literals or nodes) I thought about it for a long time at the beginning. I decided to reject the idea and to store all edges of the same kind in a single tiddler to allow quick parsing and make it possible to rename all edges by simply renaming the tiddler. (try it by clicking on an edge, renaming the edgeStore and restart).
I thought nobody would even care describing relations. Its the same case with tags in tiddlywiki. you don't bother to describe tags. It would add an extra level of complexity and I already implemented the other way. But I serously consider your input and I may change it in the future after I am done with the basics and have more time. Regards Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
