Hi Jeremy, Le samedi 22 novembre 2014 15:03:24 UTC+1, Jeremy Ruston a écrit : > > The action of the plus sign is probably not what you are expecting. > Ordinarily, each run of a filter expression starts out with the "source" > tiddlers being those prevailing where the filter is being evaluated, which > is normally equivalent to "[all[tiddlers]]". The plus sign causes the > "source" tiddlers for the following run of filter operators to be the > aggregate of all the results so far. So, in this case, including the plus > sign makes the filter equivalent to: > > [[french]listed[courses][A2]listed[levels]] >
That was my first move, and then I tried other solutions, including nested lists without finding Stephan's one. It turns that I forgot to remove the regexp support before the end of the > beta (I did add the new regexp filter operator which is intended to replace > it). I think now we'll have to keep the existing support. > It may not be lots of people using the old regexp syntax, since more experienced users like PMario and Evolena were surprised to see it, and less experienced users don't know about it. > I think with proper set operators and/or variables which could hold sets, > stuff like this could be enhanced. > > We're halfway there in 5.1.5. Variables can now contain lists, but there's > not yet a syntax to retrieve a list from a variable and use it within a > filter. > I'm looking forward to seeing it implemented (I already tried, but got weird results). Thanks, Alberto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
