In another thread, apropos the need for documentation, pmario wrote:
> - With 5.1.5. it will be possible to export tiddlers in different formats. > - So it's possible to edit content with TW. - export it - and send it > to a developer (if jeremy is ok with this workflow) > This is a very interesting idea from pmario. Imagine if it was possible for visitors to edit the documentation *directly on tw.com* (...actually a local temporary copy on the screen). Export that single(!) tiddler to have it sent as a .tid file to tw.com. Then what? Well, I can imagine many options, The tid should probably be sandboxed but it could be viewed from the original tiddler somehow (iframe in slider, or whatever). ...new visitors can read this hopefully improved *draft* and give it likes! When the number of likes reaches a threshold - voila, the original tiddler gets auto-replaced with the proposed one!!! Alternatively, a voluntary proofreader gets pinged at threshold for a final approval before it is published. I'd think much documentation does not require deep technical competence only familiarity with tw, Proofreaders could even get pinged only for their favorite subjects if the tiddler is tagged. There could also be dislikes. Negative threshold reached - poof! The purpose is to have documentation as an ongoing activity spread out on many people where even small, small contributions on the whim add up to something meaningful. "... like tiddlers composing a full wiki" (ah, even poetry) <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
