I read that - but it doesn't make sense when you look at the behaviour of the negated example.
Why is there a way to AND the tag-filter with NOT the list but there isn't a way to AND it with the list. Also, I don't really understand why it would be useful to replace the whole list as part of a filter expression. Also, I wasn't trying to solve a particular problem, but to contribute to a discussion, in response to Olivier's post, which would help me to better understand the filter syntax. Also, the way you ask "why do you expect that when..." is quite rude and I've noticed you doing this to people repeatedly. I'd rather you just didn't answer, if you're going to talk to me like I'm an idiot, to be honest. Regards, Richard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
