One more thing:

Arbitrary, community initiated lists dedicated to *topics*, opens up to 
focus on *content* in addition to tw itself. I hear mortals care about such 
matters.

Think we're on to something... 


(...just great, another 3 hour sleep night).

<:-)



On Monday, November 24, 2014 2:36:39 AM UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> Must go to bed but this is just so cool.
>
> I just realized an iframe is only necessary if you want to preview the 
> tiddler/s. You're just searching a local tiddler with a list, in your own 
> TW! And I even think you don't even need to involve proxy stuff or strict 
> assuming the already existing import feature can be made to identify urls 
> from each item in the list. The structure could maybe be very loose.
>
> But if nicely laid out, and the, say, plugin author follows some standard, 
> including providing multiple urls to things like tumbnail and description, 
> *the 
> list tiddler could be designed to apper just like any other 
> <https://addons.mozilla.org/sv-SE/firefox/search/?q=video&cat=1%2C0&appver=26.0&platform=windows>
>  
> plugin site! And we have the import feature already so a Install button 
> next to each. And it's all in your own tw!!!*
>
> *...AND the idea can be used for almost anything!* Themed such lists; 
> "the plugin list" "the beginners toolkit list" themes, mathstuff, sex, 
> drugs and rock'nroll - whatever naturally arises. If Jeremy doesn't like 
> rock'nroll on the official site, there could be *one* single agreed upon 
> place place hosting all "unofficial lists". The only type of stuff I see 
> need for some thinking is for more collaborative stuff, like core 
> documentation to get a consistent style, avoid redundence etc.
>
> On tw.com, instead of loads of actual plugins or loads of links to 
> arbitrary tiddlywikis in the wild, there are a few tiddlers with mere 
> lists! Sure, there may pop up lists in the wild but that's no problem at 
> all because contrary to the current problem with plugins and websites in 
> unknown places, an item on a list can be on multiple lists!
>
> Surprisingly simple. As far as I can tell, the only real difficulty is how 
> people should add to the list and not mess it up. Kind of the same problem 
> as discussed for documentation in the other threads. But then, for some 
> lists maybe there will be list moderators who take care of lists with 
> subjects they care for. The rate stuff is added is probably not very high 
> for an average list so maybe the moderator could even accept list 
> contributions via email (as I think pmario suggested for documentation). An 
> ambitious moderator could even make the list tiddler snazzy with other 
> stuff for his little special interest group. And it's in the interest of 
> the special interest group to keep their favourite list updated.
>
> Hm, why didn't we come up with this a long time ago. Just a few silly list 
> that someone moderates and gives to Jeremy so it can be downloaded from 
> tw.com. Am I missing something?
>
> <:-)
>
>
> On Monday, November 24, 2014 12:10:33 AM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mat,
>>
>> While doing baby-steps in terms of actual traveling and 
>> destination-like-specs... your idea definitely has it's appeal... stuffing 
>> metadata 
>> into the core (or even fetching them from someplace) and use some 
>> remote-rendering voodoo to fetch the applicable contents either via 
>> intermediary iframes or directly, in the sense of what Jeremy suggested, as 
>> a proxy-server-kind-of thing to request and access actual contents.
>>
>> The critical part being the actual MetaData authoring process... which 
>> could be yet anohter GitHub repo with a meaningful folder structure and a 
>> chron-job that mangles all the meta-bits every now and then into a 
>> *tiddlymeta.json* type of thing to be loaded / updated by the click of a 
>> button.
>>
>> Best wishes, Tobias.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to