Hi Jeremy, Much of the expert's efforts in this group is duplicated answering the much similar questions of users. Also since there a good influx of enthusiasts jumping in to make TW5 a great tool, may I suggest you to have folks move to stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com> or webapps <http://webapps.stackexchange.com/>on stackexchange to get most of the similar or simpler questions answered. Comments welcome
Thanks Shashank (Shash) On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:02:44 PM UTC+5:30, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > At todays TiddlyWiki Hangout #70 we had a discussion about surmounting the > obstacles to TiddlyWiki's broader adoption. It was triggered by this > discussion thread: > > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/_rScP9Lscdg/discussion > > I wanted to record a few concrete suggestions that we discussed. The > hangout recording can be seen here: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKDVD6mf9tk > > ! Defining roles within the TiddlyWiki community > > In order to better coordinate contributions to the project we should > identify formal roles within the community, ask for volunteers to fill > those roles, and list them on tiddlywiki.com. > > For example: > > Head of Translations > tiddlywiki.com Editor > tiddlywiki.org Editor > Owners for TiddlyWiki plugins such as CodeMirror, Highlight, KaTeX, > tw2parser > Owners for each translation > > ! Establishing a TW5 community wiki > > To provide a place for community-created documentation we should move the > current http://tiddlywiki.org content to classic.tiddlywiki.org, and > instantiate a new TW5-based TiddlySpace at tiddlywiki.org. > > We'll need a dedicated and enthusiastic editor to take ownership, just as > Tobias did for the TWC community wiki. We may also need some dev work to > get TW5 working sufficiently well on TiddlySpace. > > ! Easing the path for contributions to the docs on tiddlywiki.com > > Anyone should be able to contribute by editing tiddlywiki.com, saving > changes and submitting the resulting file to the editor. > > ! Replacing the TiddlyWikiDev discussion group with the use of GitHub > issues > > Google Groups are not working well for us. We should put the current > TiddlyWikiDev group into read-only mode and move future discussions to > GitHub. We'd gain the ability to edit posts, use syntax highlighting and > labels. > > ! Gathering testimonials from TiddlyWiki users > > Testimonials are a great way to show people the value of TiddlyWiki. We > should figure out a way to invite users to contribute a testimonial, and to > show them on tiddlywiki.com > > ! Eventually, replacing the TiddlyWiki discussion group with a federated > TiddlyWiki-based alternative > > This is a big one, and not something that we can do in the near term. It's > not the only way to free us from the limitations of Google Groups but it's > one of the most powerful. I'm not afraid of ambitious goals that take > multiple manoeuvres to accomplish; choosing the right ones is a great way > to guide and shape ones agenda. > > Best wishes > > Jeremy. > > > > -- > Jeremy Ruston > mailto:[email protected] <javascript:> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
