Hi Andrew,
> width: calc(100% + 86px);
>
Put a...
width: 100%;
... as a fallback in front. Thinking of overflow, are you sure it's
supposed to be a *+* rather than a *-* ?
height: 600px;
Did you test that? Won't it distort the embedded image? Or would you just
have a bigger frame around a smaller image? Unless your images come in the
same size, I would not set a predefined height... but perhaps that's
needed, didn't test.
z-index=-2;
Care to explain?
Also, what really helps is to make a quick TiddlySpot / upload a basic
example to dropbox and let us take a look. Makes it less hypothetical and a
lot easier to check.
Best wishes, Tobias.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
