On Tuesday, December 9, 2014 8:15:07 AM UTC-5, Stephen Kimmel wrote: > > Well it seemed like a good idea at the time. > > It still is a great idea! Thanks for going through this effort. This kind of usability study is pretty illustrating as to what steps, even mildly, experienced TiddlyWiki uses have already committed to muscle-memory.
Identification of these kinds of snags will greatly help my evangelistic efforts at work. I have had to face some of those as I have been forced to use Chrome at work for TiddlyWiki and while it is a good browser, the file saving process is a bit of a PITA compared to TiddlyFox. But even if we had a plugin available, I highly doubt my IT security policy would allow me to install it and getting anything added to the official build is a PITA several orders of magnitude higher than doing the click-save-as dance. Currently, I am using the approach of just using TiddlyWiki in my day-to-day project management and presentations and letting those early-adopters that notice get drawn in like moths to a flame. Then I plan to put together a short brown-bag session to kick-start people over the initial learning barrier. I would like to show them a few potential beginner use-cases, introduce some useful in-house reference tools that I have put together where they can use TiddlyWiki in a "read-only" manner and give them a sneak peek at some advanced database-like functionality. So thanks again for your efforts, I think they will help the project become more refined and accessible. /Mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
