RichShumaker wrote: > And I think that TiddlyWiki should be defined in an empty TiddlyWiki >
+1. IMO, missing tiddlers simply looks like it's some error which is confusing. I've brought up this subject before, but for tw.com - I even eagerly peppered Jeremy with alerts *"Oh, look look, I found yet another missing one!!!!* before realizing that, yes, there is a "missing tab" listing 100+ names! Doh! One half measure idea would be a some text in faint gray in each missing tiddler informing that [there is no content in this tiddler]. (Not quite true if it's not a tiddler to begin with.) Another route might be to de-linkify them with "~" on tw.com. Not seen then in view mode but still easily findable if we want to. As I have said before I like the biggest name I can get and I know I am in > the minority, this would be my choice for naming structure > TiddlyWiki-5-1-6-empty.html. > Why not with periods instead of hyphens: TiddlyWiki5.1.6_empty.html - I believe this works just fine, no? Even if I'd rather have it named just TiddlyWiki5.1.6.html. <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
