On Sunday, December 21, 2014 4:04:55 AM UTC-6, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Not sure if I'm missing something, but your current version does not yet > have any jQuery loaded, does it? >
If you're talking about my public site, no, I haven't uploaded the new, jQuery-enabed pages there yet, because I am not sure I am completely happy with this approach yet. > I like jQuery, so that's not it... but I would sure prefer for a tag > button in a static page to work as a simple link to a tiddler. Can't > there be the kind of progressive enhancement, whereas the default would be > to have it work as a simple link, yet within TiddlyWiki it would be a > "smart tag-pill"? > > The full-blown solution would be that static-site generation would even > generate static-tiddlers for non-existing tags, outputting a tagging list. > I concur, that is the best way to go, because then I don't have to remember to create a tiddler for every tag to have a static HTML "landing page" for it. I actually started going down that path first, and may return there at some point, but right now I am amusing myself trying to adapt a copy of the alltiddlers template into an ATOM feed. :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
