Hi Tobias, Thanks for your feedback. > > I don't think it is an issue, to the contrary. For example, it makes > search much easier. For example, try searching $, #, & ...catch my drift? >
Ok, I got your point. Isn't this approach a kind of shortcut for hidden properties or fields ? "&Supplier" standing for "networkCategory=Supplier", "$" for "projectStatus", "#" for "taskStatus", etc. They seem to be semantically equivalent, with the advantage of using all the tag features. I'll give this way of organizing a try. > What are fields' future ? Is there a will to make them more >> important/usable or not ? >> > > Just as I hoped they would be in TWc, I hope they will become *much* > smarter in TW5. I would like to see typed fields > <https://developer.salesforce.com/page/An_Introduction_to_Force_Database>, > e.g. string, number, check, select, radio... etc... as well as an ability > to define fieldsets that you can associate with filter expressions > corresponding to the tiddlers for which you wish to display a given field > or fieldset. > Sounds promising :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
