On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 12:20:40 PM UTC+1, RichardWilliamSmith wrote: > > I decided to make the experiment of each piece being the "smallest > meaningful" unit. >
OK. I see. ... but imo I've seen some tiddlers, that only contained half a sentence or a headline. ... So imo half a sentence without context looses its meaning. ... So may be in the second step .. some "mergers" would be helpful. .. but that's just my opinion. > In practice the 10,000 are the individual paragraphs, figures and > equations of the original manuscript (so really you see it was Professor > Boelkins who split the content up into 10,000 tiddlers!). If it is a little > slow, I am still happy that I can now interact with the text at this level > of granularity. > ok > One thing I imagine being able to do, for example, is for a student to be > able to click to say "this is the paragraph/equation" I don't understand > and having that information beamed to the teacher. > That makes perfect sense. .... But how do you manage to provide the context for the teacher? Because imo s/he needs the "surrounding" text to get the context or even the "big picture", for the explanation. .... But anyway ... it's a very nice TW, with a lot of potential. .. I could even think of much more tags to connect similar areas of knowledge. ... But I didn't dig deep enough for this :) have fun! mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
