Hi Tobias > > For that reason, I also don't think we need to see any *$:/*, except as a > header. >
I did experiment with that but found that it was easier to recognise the tiddler one is looking for if it's full title is displayed. > +1 on "no animations" > > I think it's important that overwritten shadows are highlighted > whereas untouched ones are not rather, > so the opposite of the current implementation. > The links are just rendered as ordinary tiddler links, there's no special highlighting of shadow tiddlers. Wouldn't it be confusing if we used a different standard for link appearance within the explorer? Best wishes Jeremy > > Best wishes, Tobias. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Jeremy Ruston mailto:[email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
