Speed has been a recurring issue since inception.

We really should find a best, common, *test engine* for this and apply it 
to an empty + a "full" TW, with + without embedded images, perhaps 
different browsers etc and see what actually makes sense. And ideally an 
engine that users can feed their own TW's into for comparison. Actually, 
such a service, even if only an external link, would be a great addition to 
tw .com IMO.

For online TW's (starting with http(s)) maybe googles PageSpeed Insights 
<https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/> is the simplest?

Could perhap yslow be used?








On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 8:32:24 AM UTC+1, Linus Johnsson wrote:
>
> I've also noticed some performance issues while searching in my TW. It 
> currently contains 1102 tiddlers and is about 3 Mb, with no embedded files. 
> There is a huge difference between my desktop PC (Intel i7-3770K) and my 
> 2013 MacBook Pro (i5), so I gather that CPU power is crucial. I use Firefox 
> exclusively. My overall feel is that TW does not scale that well, which is 
> troubling.
>
> As an aside, I think that the input lag while editing (sometimes several 
> seconds) is far worse. It increases about linearly with the number of open 
> tiddlers. Having the "Recent" tab open also makes it much worse. Since I 
> use transclusion a lot, perhaps some kind of cascading effects may be to 
> blame, although it does not seem to make much difference whether the 
> tiddler I'm editing is transcluded or not.
>
> Best regards,
> Linus
>
> Den måndag 23 februari 2015 kl. 23:36:58 UTC+1 skrev Jon:
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> no, not at all. I'll look into my file and remove the embedded jpg images 
>> and I'll see what that does.
>>
>> Regards
>> Jon
>>
>> On Monday, 23 February 2015 22:32:36 UTC, Richard Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> I hope you understand that I'm not trying to 'defend' TW, but just to 
>>> help you/us see if there is a problem of some kind that needs fixing. 
>>>
>>> The same file I mentioned has 727 svg images but only 5 jpg, so certain 
>>> file types could be an issue, I suppose. 
>>>
>>> You can get a copy of the file I mentioned here 
>>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/83055414/Active_Calculus_v0.1.html 
>>> which might help to determine whether it's your file or your set-up that's 
>>> slowing things down.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Richard
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to