I think, the important part here is. Users will always face tiddler names > only. .. you can easily prefix them. > As you said, we want to focus on humans. People usually don't want to add a prefix to each of their tiddlers only to determine the wiki or user they belongs to. Also, we don't have anything that enforces usernames.
> IMO we should go with an UUID V4 as a tiddler ID. > Felix has an algorithm in his tiddlymap library. ... IMO we should make a > pull request for the core. It is very, very unlikely, that Jeremy will change this. ... but it doesn't > prevent us from adding an UUID field with plugins. > We as plugin authors should just find a common path. .. This both things have confused me a bit. You said more or less the same that Felix and me, but I'm not sure if you subscribe our ideas or not. What do you think exactly? A pull to the core? A separate plugin? For me, providing unique IDs it's a feature that should be inside the core. Even if the core does not takes care of them neither uses them. If you think this should be a plugin, I'm fine with that as soon as all plugin authors stick to the same plugin. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/83d128aa-629b-4573-9880-1349bc3eede7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
