The proof is in the pudding. Huzah!
/*\
title: $:/core/macros/tv-get-export-path
type: application/javascript
module-type: macro
Customize the static output.
\*/
(function() {
/*jshint node: true, browser: true, sub: true */
/*global $tw: false */
"use strict";
exports.name = "tv-get-export-path";
exports.params = [{name: "title"}];
exports.run = function(title) {
// A falsey return value means use the default path.
return $tw.wiki.getTiddler(title).fields["_static_path"];
};
})();
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 9:54:32 PM UTC-4, Devin Weaver wrote:
>
> Wait this feature seems to already be there:
> http://tiddlywiki.com/#tv-get-export-path%20Variable
>
> On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 at 5:47:30 PM UTC-4, Devin Weaver wrote:
>>
>> So here is my use case and I'd like to propose a feature (obviously I
>> would implement and send a pull request).
>>
>> I have a static site blog (http://tritarget.org/) And to be honest the
>> build is way to complicated for my liking. Jekyl kept fighting me and using
>> metelsmith now is like a 10 minute deploy step. It's silly. None of which
>> takes in to account JavaScript. I'm a JS developer by day. I love
>> frameworks like Ember.JS and such. But these frameworks are not so useful
>> as a blog because search engines can't crawl it well. Then I saw hoe
>> tiddlywiki.com does it! Perfect a fully fledged (and I'll admit,
>> beautiful) single page app that does everything I want including writing
>> out tiddlers to static files. Perfect!
>>
>> The gotcha: the current site already has several back links to it.
>> Changing the names and file structure of those static HTML files would
>> trash the current search results and break a lot of other people's links.
>> So what I want to to recreate the site in TiddlyWiki and have my build
>> process also render the static files but use a field to determine the
>> outputs file/directory names. This way new content can easily be managed
>> and created while old content can keep it's legacy paths.
>>
>> I'd propose to add a feature to look at a tiddlers fields for something
>> like "_static_path" and use that (kinda like how external images use
>> "_cononical_url").
>>
>> I'd like to work on this and would be happy to send a PR. Is it worth it
>> for the community?
>>
>> On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 9:28:40 PM UTC-4, Devin Weaver wrote:
>>>
>>> The documentation is a little sparse on this. When attempting to render
>>> static files
>>> <http://tiddlywiki.com/#Generating%20Static%20Sites%20with%20TiddlyWiki>
>>> is there a way to choose the output path/filename or is is based on the
>>> tiddlers directory structure or the tiddler titles?
>>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ef6096da-993a-45ee-9eab-51445be7d5a2%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
