Can you see the attached pictures?
Yes, it is tiddlywiki running on an e-reader. Specifically the Kobo aura
h2o. It works reasonably well. This is the full tiddlywiki.com site, so
smaller tiddlywikis without images should work even better. Scrolling is a
bit slow, but every button and component works as expected.
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-S1WAcmU5fzM/Va04sZmDb4I/AAAAAAAAOMY/WC-NjmAQglA/s1600/DSC_1269.JPG>
This was the only serious drawback, searching:
<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Vc_JUq5Iov0/Va05-BntReI/AAAAAAAAOMg/v_z6AEsDQVM/s1600/DSC_1271.JPG>
At the end, searching worked, but after typing the first "t" it took the
browser ten seconds to allow me typing the second character. That is
ridiculous. Do we really need to search a single character in a wiki full
of text? I can't see anyone doing that, I never did. Every search engine on
every application/website I know limits the search to be at least three
characters long. Maybe we can start at two, but seriously one character is
ridiculous and it is useless in 99% of situations. The benefits are non
existent and it causes enough performance issues in such big number of
platforms to consider it.
Regards.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e4cfa90d-2b5b-4d4b-90d2-8ce688e5a65f%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
