Thank God it's 2.7MB, not 2.7GB. I just thought my 22MB TiddlySpace space 
was so easily out-sized.
Big TWC files do function okay, but save and load slowly. Hopefully someday 
TW5 can save them.

RickL於 2015年8月2日星期日 UTC+8上午6時55分25秒寫道:
>
> Yes, of course it is 2.7 MB - sorry for that...don't know what I was 
> thinking.
> I have read a bit more on the forums and see there are others with much 
> larger TW than that which seem to function OK...
>
>
> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 6:23:29 PM UTC-4, Mark S. wrote:
>>
>> Are you sure that it's 2.7 GB? Not maybe 2.7 Mb?  that's an astounding 
>> amount of information. It's hard to imagine that you're experiencing only a 
>> little lag saving/loading. I can't think how you could have acquired that 
>> much data -- unless you're loading it up with images. If so, then the 
>> solution is to make the images external to the actual TW.
>>
>> There's no relational database behind TW. Indexed or relational databases 
>> are usually necessary for dealing with large amounts of data. That means 
>> that TW will always hit an impasse based primarily on the power of the 
>> hardware that supports it. 
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On Saturday, August 1, 2015 at 2:30:18 PM UTC-7, RickL wrote:
>>>
>>> I love TiddlyWiki and have used it daily for almost a year.  I began in 
>>> January to make my journal and notebook digital instead of a paper 
>>> notebook.  I love the flexibility and the linking of topics.   The closest 
>>> thing I have found that works.  
>>>
>>> My concern is with true longevity. Though I have several TiddlyWikis, my 
>>> main notebook (Common-place book, Zettelkasten, call it what you will - 
>>> that's how I use it) is 2.7 GB and I have started noticing a lag in saving 
>>> and loading, particularly on my phone (I use AndTidWiki and Dropbox with my 
>>> Android phone).  At this rate of growth I worry about how useful it will be 
>>> in 3 years.  I use it with Chrome and Arlen's TiddlyChrome.
>>>
>>> There is the option to split the TiddlyWiki into two or more, but that 
>>> takes away a lot of the functionality with no way to link between files.
>>>
>>> Every release amazes me with the new tools available. I know this 
>>> product is just out of beta and under constant development so I hope there 
>>> can be a way to address this.  Maybe the solution is already out there and 
>>> I don't know about it.
>>>
>>> Keep up the great work!
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Rick
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5bc3927a-5d83-4084-a028-24850ea4d8ef%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to