Hi John, 
at the present time firefox is supporting a file api with the new extension 
api. This means that it is possible to implement the current tiddlyfox 
functionality. I wrote the tiddlyclip firefox plugin which I plan to 
re-write with the new api. - however mozilla has had enormous problems with 
the electrolysis project - and it has been delayed many times - I have 
given up trying to get anything to work until they release electrolysis 
into the beta channel - otherwise I feel I am wasting my time. When I port 
tiddlyclip I will help port tiddlyfox - if some else has not already done 
it.

Cheers

BJ

On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 5:02:14 AM UTC+1, John-Kim Murphy wrote:
>
> If I understand this article 
> <http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/08/mozilla-sets-plan-to-dump-firefox-add-ons-move-to-chrome-like-extensions/>
>  
> correctly, does it mean TiddlyFox will no longer work in future versions of 
> Firefox? Firefox is dropping support for XUL add-ons, and TiddlyFox uses 
> XUL, right?
>
> I have a feeling TiddlyFox cannot be fully ported to the new, limited 
> programming model...
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d8fd0b62-8746-436f-a855-324cf2dc90b0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to