If we for the time being ignore "meaning units", the structure is rather
something like this:
- Foo (tags: concept)
- Bar (tags: Foo concept)
- Baz (tags: Bar memo)
- Mumble (tags: Bar concept)
- Frotz (tags: Foo memo)
In other words, concepts tag other concepts, and memos tag concepts.
Meaning units ("mu") add some complexity. They can be thought of as
snippets of text (for instance quotations) to be coded and categorised.
- Foo (tags: concept)
- Eeney (tags: Foo mu)
- Bar (tags: Foo concept)
- Meaney (tags: Bar mu)
- Gronk (tags: Meaney memo)
- Baz (tags: Bar memo)
- Mumble (tags: Bar concept)
- Frotz (tags: Foo Miney memo)
Where "Miney" is a meaning unit which is not directly tagged with any
concept, but is nevertheless indirectly associated with Foo (through the
memo Frotz). A meaning unit can thus be brought in under a concept either
by tagging it directly with the concept, or by writing a memo about the
concept and also tagging that memo with the meaning unit.
If I understand your notion of "recursive" filter correctly, one would
still need something equivalent to x-plore to create a list that can be
used in further filter runs (in my case, to weed out anything but the
concepts)?
Best regards,
Linus
2015-09-16 7:27 GMT+02:00 Tobias Beer <[email protected]>:
> Here's an example tagging tree and how I understand you wish to
> collect all "descendant memos":
>
> - *Foo *(is category)
> - *Bar *(tags: Foo Memo)
> - *Baz *(tags: Bar Memo)
> - *Mumble *(tags: Bar)
> - *Frotz *(tags: Foo)
> - *Gronk *(tags: Frotz Memo)
>
> So, the recursive-flat-list would return for category *Foo* and tag
> *Memo:*
>
> - Bar, Baz, Gronk
>
> Not sure how exactly "Meaning Units" fit into this picture and how they
> relate to either categories or memos.
>
> As you only wish a flat list as the output, the traversal could actually
> be accomplished with a new recursive filter, rather than a macro or widget.
>
> Hope this is makes sense. Looking forward to your ideas!
>>
>
> Try to provide real-life examples equivalent to the above.
> That tends to make things more clear, possibly to you as well. ;-)
>
> — tb
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/tiddlywiki/XH4tgLlr7fY/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/62b33306-7717-4f14-a019-b16a68a8e8dc%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/62b33306-7717-4f14-a019-b16a68a8e8dc%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CANHXGJR58dJStgn_94OE76_DngzmmORg0sswjKjwPY_iJewyEQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
