Might I interject with the term *"a reference manual"* as opposed to *"a user manual"*? That's how the current documentation feels to me. If you know specifically what you're looking for, then I'm sure it's great. But from a complete beginner's perspective it's difficult to find the information you need, with specific, useful examples.
On Sunday, September 20, 2015 at 9:43:47 PM UTC+12, Evolena wrote: > > For example, it's a detail but I don't like to have to open a new tiddler > to access examples. > It's more of a sentiment than of a reasoning, but I understand when people > find it too developper-centric. Maybe it has become too formal, less > explicit *per se*. I reckon it's been a lot of work to formalize it, but > it doesn't match to what I'm looking for most of the time, it's like an > advanced documentation (which can also be useful from time to time). > > Le dimanche 20 septembre 2015 10:54:32 UTC+2, Tobias Beer a écrit : >> >> Hi Evolena, >> >> >>> I must admit that I'm not fond of the new documentation too, I often >>> open an old TW5.1.7 to retrieve a simplest presentation. >> >> >> What exactly would you mean? >> Can you give an example? >> >> -tb >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ee4843df-6c66-4c8a-b342-ffd80efc0328%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
