Hi, I came across something strange in relation with the setWidget, when used with a filter in order to affect a value to a variable (the value= ... emptyValue=... syntax) It seems that I can't affect an empty string as value although I can do it with emptyValue.
Try the following code in a tiddler : \define myFilter1() "something" \define myFilter2() "" <$set name="foo" filter=<<myFilter1>> value="" emptyValue="value if empty"> foo: <<foo>> </$set> <$set name="bar" filter=<<myFilter2>> value="value if not empty" emptyValue=""> bar: <<bar>> </$set> In the first case the value stored in foo is the value of the filter : something, while I was expecting an empty string. In the second case, bar is an empty string as requested. I must admit it's a very narrow use-case, but I don't know if this behaviour is expectet or not so I prefer to just pass the info. FrD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/71cf8240-090e-47eb-9aec-20723e65840c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
