Hi Jeremy, > You’ve made this point before. However, it is not true of the current > filter operators, nor can we retrospectively fix it. So, that boat has > sailed, and we have no choice but to continue to use “!” for the more > informal sense of “inversion” that we use at the moment. >
I'm aware of that and had to learn to accept that there are no intentions to change existing filters in that regard. However, that does not mean that we should encourage such patterns for future filter implementations / modifications. Best wishes, — tb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/faaa84eb-31eb-4530-ad35-8017cf68beeb%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
