Hi Jed,
The first option would mean the user would first need to remember which footnote referred to the book they wanted to reference, so it wouldn't work well in practice, particularly as the list grows. The ideal, as you've suggested, would be to be able to reference a list from a central location, so I think the 2nd option would be preferred but I appreciate the complexity involved might mean it's not worth the bother. Thanks, Jon On Sunday, 3 January 2016 10:40:32 UTC, Jed Carty wrote: > > Using <<footnote 1>> for book 1 wouldn't be hard to do, making <<footnote > 1>> list the first footnote which you then set would be more difficult and > you couldn't set it in the editor without a lot of work. > > The two reasonable options would be <<footnote 1>> which always gives the > same reference wherever it is or <<footnote 1>> which marks the first > footnote and after you leave the editor there is a one-time dropdown menu > at the location of the footnote in the text which you can use to set the > reference for that footnote. > Unless you have some great desire for the second version I would suggest > the first one. While the second one is doable it would be pretty complex to > create because of the bookkeeping required. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b1d81d3d-6b1d-47af-b62a-1727f37c0a03%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
