On Tuesday, January 5, 2016 at 10:03:06 PM UTC+1, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Mario, > > >> So your tc-rating may be tb-c-rating ... otherwise the class name >> suggests, that it is a core class. >> > > Not sure it's needed but I could go with *tb-rating*. > You could, but you may find out, that you may want to create custom messages in the future too. so imo tb-m-xxx may be the right move. tbc- using your initials, would be possible too, but I think it's too similar to tc-... so I added the additional "-".. pmc would work for my initials, but in favour of consistency I'd use pm-c :)
> As for those conventions, the same thing kinda applies to field-names. > > I mean, I am using the "rating" field as a default. > Should that also be *tb-rating*? > I don't think it should. > If we want consistency, you probably should. ... Only the future will tell, if your plugins cause naming clashes with user content. Let's see, what Jeremy thinks. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d624e7a3-2729-440b-8b5f-0ab9e55bbd96%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
