@Jeremy Inspired by Jeds Résumé edition, I'm thinking I too should attempt to make something that might hopefully become as good and accepted as an edition. For ideas of what I have in mind, see Appetizer TW's <http://twaddle.tiddlyspot.com/#Appetizer%20TiddlyWikis>
1) Elsewhere you've mentioned that an edition should best avoid plugins that are not in standard distro or they'd have to be included in the plugin library too. 1a) ...but I take it that all plugins, themes etc that are on tiddlywiki.com can be included without a problem, right? (I don't have any one particular in mind, it's just a general question.) 1b) Are there other such *technical *conditions/preferences? 2) I have a particular type of list with items in mind. These items are to be tiddlers and display some common data. I could put all this data in the text field but the data consists of several discrete types of data. I will also want the user to easily create new items. To me it seems that fields would be an ideal solution for this, including presenting them as a kind of //form// when a user is to create a new item. But I note that fields are not searched, neither the field names nor the filed values (!?) So... 2a) What would be a better way than splitting the data into fields? 2b) Altenatively, is there a good way to make fields show in search? Ideally not all fields, only the ones I specify. Thank you Jeremy! <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/16ca76f1-3917-447d-a376-5d8e5376fab2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
