Yeah, that was my concern. I thought it would be worth raising though, considering how much additional utility it could provide. Is there any system or procedure for making backwards incompatible changes like this? Or is it just "too late, tough luck" (not that I'll be upset, just trying to understand)
On Friday, February 19, 2016 at 2:24:39 AM UTC-5, Tobias Beer wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > Good point. I'm afraid this would be a non backwards-compatible change, > though. > The only way to go about it would be new fields, or perhaps some > field-value prefix that has TiddlyWiki retroactively interpret fields as > list-fields, e.g: > > list-before: as-list => foo [[bar baz]] > > Best wishes, > > Tobias. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/bb68d994-ca81-48e7-b097-cf4d72726acd%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
