[These thoughts have been hinted previously, not least during @Jed and my 
discussions on TWederation. The idea with a filter operator is new though, 
AFAIK]

Would it be possible with a a filter operator that ouputs a link but really 
also builds a bundle (where the link is the title to the bundle)? 

I use the term "bundle" because it is closely related to what @Jed has 
already implemented but also because if the idea here were implemented it 
would probably replace the current manifestation of bundles; anyway, the 
idea is a titlelink that serves as a *collective reference* in a more *physical 
*sense. If we compare a title link to a tag (i.e a pure tag, not a tiddler 
title) then you can do things with tiddler(-titles) but not really with 
tags. The idea I'm after is to merge the two so that you have a kind of 
collective lable that you can manipulate and it translates into 
manipulating the associated tiddlers.To* batch manage* tiddlers.

For example (and this is the original use case from the discussions with 
@Jed), the resulting titlelink can be dragged between TWs like any other 
titlelink. This would make it super easy for anyone to create a kind of 
light version of a plugin (very much like Jeds bundles).

..but any kind of batch processing could be imagined. 

Now, opening (clicking on) such a link could - I imagine - open either of;


   1. that set of tiddlers (i.e as if you were opening a permaview)
   2. one compound tiddler that shows the input tiddlers as if one document 
   (think text-slicer edition)
   3. possibly, like with plugins, merely the input title links


I guess it depends on intended use for it; as a way to serve a tiddler 
document (#1) or more of a traditional document (#2) or just for e.g drag'n 
drop transferral of tids (#3).

Example syntax:

[tag[foo]prefix[bar]] +bundle[MyBundle]]

The output is the bundle, here titled MyBundle "containing" the filtered 
tiddlers. If no bundle name is provided, a default name could be applied. 
Or maybe the syntax could be with the bundle operator outside of the filter.

Maybe they'd even make sense as an alternative to tagpills - i.e they, just 
like tag(pills) serve as category lables but you could also dragn drop them.

If anyone were to implement it, a thought is that it seems to have some 
similarities with the listed filter operator.

Crazy?


<:-)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d15bd90a-f472-4c4f-9623-20096cf6ed5e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to