Hegart Dmishiv wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with you here. I don't think TiddlyWiki should try to > be "all things to all people". >
I'd say Yes and No; IMO it should ideally be extensible to meet peoples needs but standard TW should definitely not cover everything. Obviously there are many restrictions regardless. But *that *discussion is really way bigger than my point in the OP which is: It'd be nice if we could solve the "in-house needs" for TW with "in-house tools". You make a tiddler and need an icon for it - it'd simply be nice if one can do it in-house. Want Mona Lisa, then GIMP away ;-) <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/50a0e661-0e74-472e-8914-847352a793d9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
