just wondering, do you view the workflowy instance from within TW5 using 
iframes, or just open a new tab to work in?

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 at 9:04:35 PM UTC-6, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> Just wanted to note that I have been integrating TiddlyWiki and Workflowy 
> quite well. Each one counteracts the shortcomings of the other. I use a 
> central TW to create a tag based hierarchy of topic tiddlers. And the 
> tiddlers contain no text, only links to the corresponding articles in 
> Workflowy. If a given topic would be better served by a TiddlyWiki (i.e., 
> embedded images, wiki links and more control over the page style and text 
> formatting), I create a TW and link to it from the central TW.
>
> Why this approach?
>
> 1. Workflowy is better for free writing and rearranging as I write. It is 
> a writing tool. It allows me to work far faster than TW ever could. By 
> contrast, putting asterisks for bulleted lists or @@ for indenting, etc, 
> takes me out of the zone when writing in TW. So I write my actual content 
> in Workflowy.
> 2. Workflowy is also infinitely scaleable. No concern about ever hitting a 
> filesize ceiling. And no need to create multiple TiddlyWikis and have to 
> manage them.
> 3. But tagging, listing and filtering are much nicer in TiddlyWiki. There 
> is no tool like TiddlyWiki for showing relationships between topics 
> (tiddlers) like TiddlyWiki. 
> 4. And the search in TW is so fast and flexible compared to pretty much 
> anything out there. By contrast, searching in Workflowy, even when using 
> its tag system, turns up reams of irrelevant stuff, because topic titles 
> are not distinguished from content in WF as they are in TW.
>
> So when I have even something small worth saving, I create a topic tiddler 
> and tag it, and in the edit template I have a link to open up the notes 
> section of my Workflowy. I write the note or article or outline or whatever 
> it is in Workflowy, then grab the link from the browser bar (every single 
> bullet in WF has its own URL), and paste it into the still open tiddler. If 
> the topic already has a tiddler with a link to that topic in WF, I open 
> that tiddler and open the WF link there and add the note there. Pretty 
> quick system. 
>
> So now I have a virtually infinite CMS using one central TW, a WF account, 
> and the occasional topical TW file here and there. Filesize is irrelevant 
> because the tiddlers in the central TW only have one link in them, and 
> maybe one or two tags. The system is easy for inductive dumping and tagging 
> when I find something worth saving in my reading and browsing, and is also 
> easy for writing a longer article or project in WF and wanting to find it 
> quickly using TW, and is also easy for a more deductive process of creating 
> a hierarchy from above with new here buttons then adding WF links later.
>
> $50/yr may seem steep for the pro account of WF, but I have found it well 
> worth it. Here is a shared section of my Workflowy with more information: 
> https://workflowy.com/s/VQgA01nJMn
>
> As you can tell, this system doesn't require much on the TW end to 
> implement. The only real addition needed is a tiddler tagged 
> $:/tags/EditTemplate with a link to the URL of the section in WF where you 
> keep your notes. And maybe the new here button made visible in the tiddler 
> toolbar. That's pretty much it.
>
> Hope someone here finds this helpful. For me it is the end of a long 
> obsessive quest that saw me produce many experiments along the way. Finally 
> feel like I got there. The only things I might wish for now are a few 
> additions to WF like embedded images that are not a hack, and pretty links 
> like [[viewed text|URL]]. But to be honest, I am content with this system 
> as is.
>
> Blessings,
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7f4c7ef5-7eaa-496b-970a-a14b58e3b535%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to