Steve Yesterday I replied to this but I think I must have deleted the reply by mistake. Here is another attempt.
I use Scrapbook. Looking at an RDF for it I can see it COULD quite easily be converted into a JSON file that could be imported into a TiddlyWiki. BUT ... Though the RDF has simple entries for SINGLE pages, for multiple pages, i.e. for whole SITES, it looks more complex with internal cross references. They don't look easy to JSONise. The THREE TYPES of information it holds--(1) links to DOWNLOADED SINGLE pages; (2) BOOKMARKS of sites; & (3) NOTES, look to have an UNproblematic RDF data structure so those, at least, may be easy to migrate to TW. Best wishes Josiah On Monday, 2 May 2016 18:55:01 UTC+2, SteveSchneider DesignWriteX wrote: > > Hello all. > > This topic has been floating around my world for many years (maybe 10?), > but perhaps now the time is ripe to do something with it! > > I've long been a fan of the ancient old Firefox extension, Scrapbook: > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/scrapbook/. > > Among other things, Scrapbook archives on a local drive all necessary page > requisites to re-present Web pages. From a currently visible Web page, > Scrapbook will collect all and store all page requisites, rewrite necessary > html to reflect local links, and provide a durable link of the archived > page in full HTML complexity. Preferences handle downloads of media. > (Preferences can also be set to handle following links one or more layers > out, so that Scrapbook can be a small scale web crawler, but that's a > different project...) > > For TW users, one use case might be this: Given a current timestamp of > 20160404203343 (reflecting YYYYMMDDHHMMSS), and a scrapbook directory is > set as scrapbook/, then a just-scrapbooked page will be displayed at > http://../scrapbook/20160404203343/index.html --- and with a small amount > of tweaking we can imagine a macro that would return a durable link to a > scrapbooked page: <<scrapbook 20160404203343>>. (I built something like > this in TWC a few years back: > http://bit.do/tiddlwiki-classic-scrapbook-web-archiving-system - haven't > looked at it for a while, but it worked well enough). > > There are two things I'd like to do: > > 1 > update my old scrapbook code to work with classic > > 2 > import the RDF file produced by Scrapbook as tiddlers > > Was wondering if anyone has played in this space recently, or has any > thoughts about how to go about importing and processing RDF files? And/or > jettisoning Scrapbook altogether in favor of something else that does the > same work? > > Thanks! > > //steve. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/1887a4a0-d948-414f-b52a-5aaa569c9cc7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
