I DO really get you are into it. You developed some of what is possible and have done it on Twitter.
I still think it should be more central. lets take examples ... (1) Why can't just I easily transfer a Tiddler to GMAIL? Its not theoretically difficult. (2) LINKEDIN has a method for URL posting not unlike Twitter. None of it will be exactly easy. MY point is that TW left outside of basic POSTING to social networks is impoverished. I DO GET the contradiction that many of those systems want servers, not files doing Javascript. BUT that is where TW is coming from. And somehow mastering that seems important for its growth. Josiah On Wednesday, 25 May 2016 13:28:16 UTC+2, Jed Carty wrote: > > Here are my reactions to trying to work with facebook > <http://ooktech.com/jed/externalbrain/#Facebook%20has%20terrible%20documentation>, > > heavily edited to remove the profanity. And google+ doesn't (or at least > didn't) have anything in place to let you even try to post to it or fetch > posts from it. If you can figure out how to make the api's from any of the > big silos do something useful I would be happy to help integrate it into > tiddlywiki. > > Even twitter, which makes posting simple at least, has mostly > indecipherable documentation on how to retrieve tweets using anything other > than their embedded list things like I have on my site. > > So in my experience it isn't so much as underdevelopment on the side of > tiddlywiki as social networks refusing to play nicely with others. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/5aad96ca-cfa4-4e01-88af-13f74719f229%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
