Hi Richard

> Hi Jeremy,
> 
> Worked for me without complaint - 
> http://elsewhere.neocities.org/tiddlywikicom.html and I find that I am able 
> to access it at both http and https immediately - 
> https://elsewhere.neocities.org/tiddlywikicom.html

Excellent news, thank you.

> Initially it seems that the daily ipfs cache of neocities sites will store 
> each one as an archive blob (I'm not sure of this) but if, eventually, they 
> archive individual files, then it would be very easy to get the power of ipfs 
> working for us. I am excited about the possibility of having a 'tiddler 
> manifest' document which then pulls all of the tiddlers from IPFS 
> individually. To me the idea of distributed/permanent/versioned content 
> (including code) and Tiddlywiki as a trusted personal tool for authoring and 
> consuming that content is very interesting; ipfs is the ultimate way to 'set 
> the tiddlers free' and tiddlers may even prove to be a useful paradigm in 
> themselves for thinking about truly distributed content.

Well put; there's a great appeal to assembling the wiki from individual tiddler 
files. I did some experimentation with Dropbox's JavaScript API a couple of 
years ago and concluded that performance was a bit of an obstacle: the trouble 
is that HTTP is an expensive protocol, hence all the various hacks (like image 
sprites) that are designed to help pack multiple resources into a single 
network request. There is also an issue with atomicity of writing to multiple 
files; it's hard to cope elegantly with the browser tab being closed (or 
network connectivity being lost) in the middle of a save/sync operation.

Meanwhile, and somewhat orthogonally, one of the characteristics of TiddlyWiki 
that makes it particularly interesting for experimenting with distributed webby 
stuff is actually that it (can be) a completely self contained single file. For 
systems like Tahoe-LAFS and (possibly IPFS) the problem of serving a single 
file is a bit easier than serving multiple files while maintaining the same 
relative addressing.

Best wishes

Jeremy.

> 
> Regards,
> Richard
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TiddlyWiki" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/7f5c7679-a029-4e70-80a9-6f9781b3de78%40googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/197C1071-2E76-468D-BFB8-A404271895A6%40gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to