On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 2:58:09 PM UTC+2, Josiah wrote: > > two small points on this where I actually have some competence ... > > 1) treat it as a CSS issue in the first instance > 2) treat it as a CSS issue in the second instance :-) >
:) Yea, that's the problem here. TiddlyWiki is more like a general purpose word processor, but CSS was developed for html pages, where you have the possibility to adjust your CSS for just "one" page. SPAs need a bit more attention, but are still not that powerful as the TW transclusion method, where you can transclude any content into a completely *different context*. .. So designing fully "nestable" CSS, that covers all the edge cases is difficult. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/12428e79-b358-4525-abe8-b6aecacdc0cc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
