I think this has been brought up many times before and TiddlyWiki Google groups is not going away anytime soon.
I started using Stack Exchange network of sites recently though (more specifically Blender.Stackexchange) and I've been loving the format and the way it works. I wonder if it would be adequate for TiddlyWiki, but from my experience everything indicates that it could work quite well. On Wednesday, 22 June 2016 12:37:32 UTC+1, Josiah wrote: > > Ciao all > > After much sweat and endless toying I figured out how to look back over > posts here in a way i could finally find relevant stuff. Sometimes they are > gold. Often mush unless you have the time to wade through entire threads. > > What DOES stand out is that with ... > > 1. decent tagging of OPTIMAL answers > 2. more cross-linking to relevant resources > 3. a bit more thought by (informed) contributors that discussions > could really helpfully add to documentation, possibly create it ... > > ... in short, it could solve a lot of the "documentation gap". As is I see > perpetual re-creation of the wheel. > > > The IRONY is this group has to be one of the most user-friendly on the > planet that's losing its history daily. > > > I am not NOT convinced that the way Google Groups work is optimal for what > is needed. > > > Best wishes > > Josiah > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/26522df9-e56b-4fca-9b0f-c43edf0ad790%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
