Ciao RichardWS

IPFS interests me as part-and-parcel of the broad issue of TW deliberately 
not being server dependent. I think its suffered, not because of any of its 
limitations, but because the dominance of server dependent models in 
software design on networking & communications, and poor protocols, made it 
much harder to get steps.

So ANY initiatives that show how to assert non-server dominated steps that 
can help TW better interact are worthy of full examination IMO. What is 
doable is I think a very OPEN question.

Best wishes
Josiah

On Sunday, 26 June 2016 04:17:18 UTC+2, RichardWilliamSmith wrote:
>
> And as for using ipfs for a distributed node-like implementation online, 
>> that would be awesome. There would unfortunately be problems with 
>> read-write privileges and the like. I imagine it would be easiest to make 
>> something that could dynamically build a wiki from a set of distributed tid 
>> files on page load, but you could do the same thing using http. 
>> Fundamentally http(s) is also a way to access a distributed file system so 
>> that aspect of it doesn't necessarily allow any novel applications.
>>
>
> The novel applications come (imo) from the fact that ipfs is 
> content-addressable - you ask for tiddlers by their hash, not a location. 
> It also has signed namespaces that you can use as a pub location for 
> pub/sub and built-in versioning. As far as I understand it, the best way to 
> explain ipfs is something like "bit-torrent, with git on top, with the web 
> on top of that" and there are no servers, only peers in a swarm. If you 
> publish something, then I view it and then you go offline, other people can 
> still get what you published from me, and yet there's no way I can tamper 
> with it. There are also proposals for an incentivisation layer (filecoin) 
> that would let you pay a small amount to guarantee your content to remain 
> hosted, though in practise anything of interest to more than a few people 
> will remain live anyway. All of this, of course, is far from ready for 
> widespread adoption and, as I say, I have a lot to learn about it all.
>
> RR
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/3530d83f-a20a-4c2d-88d3-bfe31df25749%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to