Thanks for your feedback, Coda! You are right, I will have to explain the id better … and in fact I had tried to eliminate this parameter at first. But I came to the conclusion that it might be a feature in some cases, while it is not a real issue in most others. In fact, the id is only needed to separate TextStretch-elements from the *same* tiddler. TiddlyWiki’s state-mechanism cares for the rest. So thousands of tiddlers are not a problem. If you analyse Mat’s solution, you will find an id element too, hidden in the appendix (e.g. _1) to the label. This results in more complex macro code, because you have to separate the label from the id again. Whe I realised this, I opted for transparency and simpler code. And yes: to bother users with an additional parameter. I hope I find the time to update the docs soon. Cheers, Thomas
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/f3264a85-1b4e-4fac-9075-5d01cdaec64f%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
