I think the ultimate implementation would involve firstly updating the text > reference format to understand a syntax for identifying properties within > the object, and then updating the places that use text references (such as > the editor widget) to use the new code. > > As far as the text reference is able to understand the JSON dot notation, there is no need to modify anything else, or I am missing something? I have to admit that I get lost easily with the code of the editor widget.
> Writing an editor for type application/json would be the route to go if > you were writing a generic JSON editor, one that edits an entire file, > rather than an individual property. > > To be honest, I don't find that so interesting. There is no much difference between editing a JSON tiddler as text if you are editing the whole file. What is useful is to be able to edit an individual property, no matter how nested . That way creating user interfaces for editing complex configurations would be a breeze. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/76b096f1-fb46-46e3-8dc9-6788caea2db5%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
