On Wednesday, 17 August 2016 15:49:58 UTC+1, Mat wrote:
>
> *TWederation and TiddlyWiki 
> networks... Oh-that's-not-my-concern-I'm-just-a-regular-TW-user"*
>
> If YOU are thinking along those lines, then I'm *particularly *talking to 
> you here! I will request your help about *how* to best present 
> explanations for exactly those things, for you:
>

I've been following along with TWederation, and even took part in some of 
the demo at the meetup. I fully understand the "How" it works and "What" it 
does.

What I completely fail to see is the "Why". More specifically I fail to see 
where such a system would actually provide a working use outside of 
contrived setups just to prove the techniques.

TWs are not normally static. They grow and are used for many different 
things. Cross loading the entries into another TW, the entry then becomes a 
static value. Forever embedded. If the original is updated, the TWederated 
value still remains at the old value. Good for historical reasons. Bad for 
interaction.

What I would like to see as a main "selling" point, is an actual real use 
case which can be utilised by general users. A "discussion" forum is not 
what I would consider a valid use case. It needs to be something specific 
to the core of what a TiddlyWiki is.

D.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/e28cacca-1f5d-4900-b2ed-ababbef4ff34%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to