So expanding the universe of "system" tiddlers is considered OK and a best practice? [ I really like that this precludes them from being found in basic search! ]
It looks like there are 133 "system" tiddlers to begin with. I would end up with a lot more as I am contemplating this scheme for transcluding such "hidden" tiddlers . . . Is there possibly another "preferred" way or am I on the correct path? Thanks in advance! On Monday, October 24, 2016 at 10:44:24 PM UTC-7, Jed Carty wrote: > > There isn't anything unsafe about adding $:/ to a tiddler title. It gets > no special privileges, it just isn't listed in recent and in a few other > places. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/05d5c1f9-506c-4021-afb6-3ef776e73ee3%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
