the whole "documentation" thing is interesting. and frustrating. 

your ideas here say something important. 

in my mind (now) saying what "IT" is that is actually needed is actually 
quite difficult. There seem to be several levels.

1 - The "missing MANUAL" (aka hopes that Eric Shulman might get to a point 
be could publish one before my beard hits the floor :-)

2 - TRACKING. You are Absolutely Right that in the last few months there 
has been ENORMOUS innovations with TW. But the Google Group fog settles 
settles quickly and unless you are noting them at the time it treats 
everything the same and its a swamp that eats it all unless you downloaded 
things quick. This is a lot to do the fact its a really blunt instrument 
once something is not under active discussion.

3 - SHOWCASES. This is likely closest to what would help my cognitive 
style. I learn most from seeing FULL working TW's, not minimalist demos. I 
think its an area that is particularly weak.

4 - Your IN CONTEXT idea is interesting. But I don't think its workable for 
the main site. Not least because Mr JR does not, I think rightly, want to 
get too distracted by the burden of end-user oriented documentation. As far 
as I read that site its about fundamental logics. Parts of it are 
naive-user friendly, much of of it isn't and probably should not be.

Just thoughts
Josiah

On Monday, 20 February 2017 14:54:31 UTC+1, David Gifford wrote:
>
> Just a word of thanks to everyone who has been creating all this good 
> stuff recently for TiddlyWiki: details, presentations, next/previous 
> navigation, tweets, family trees, etc etc, my list of Firefox bookmarks of 
> things to experiment with later in TiddlyWiki is getting full. Fun time to 
> be into TiddlyWiki, and I hope it really takes off this time. Every time 
> people start talking about documentation, I start wishing I had more time 
> and energy, so I could do a TW5 version of TiddlyWiki for the rest of us, 
> or a few tutorials on setting up a TiddlyWiki for this or that use case. 
>
> One idea for documentation might be to have popups, in tiddlywiki.com 
> only, not on empty.html, that overlay each shadow tiddler when it is 
> opened, and explain it: 
>
> "You just opened the shadow tiddler $:/tags/ViewTemplate. The list field 
> of this tiddler controls the order in which items are shown when a tiddler 
> is in view mode. For example, a tiddler's tags are viewed below the tiddler 
> title but above the contents of the tiddler. 
>
> To rearrange the position of existing items, edit $:/tags/ViewTemplate and 
> reorder the items in the list field to your liking. If you create a custom 
> tiddler with the tag $:/tags/ViewTemplate, and would like to control where 
> it appears on tiddlers in view mode, insert that tiddler's title in the 
> appropriate place of the list field of the tiddler $:/tags/ViewTemplate. If 
> that tiddler's title is more than one word, you will need to enclose the 
> title with double brackets [[ ]]. 
>
> Be aware that any changes that TiddlyWiki makes to this shadow tiddler in 
> the future will not be applied to your altered version of it. Also, by 
> altering this tiddler, it will now appear in the list of systems tiddlers 
> (Sidebar > More tab > System tab)
>
> (X) Close this explanation"
>
> I have a feeling that doing this would bloat tiddlywiki.com. Perhaps 
> there could be a tiddlywiki.com/tutorial.html with this kind of thing in 
> it. Just a thought.
>
> Blessings to everyone,
>
> Dave
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/eb8c6d22-6423-4b32-a0d2-d2319766757b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to