Being an amateur geneaologist, I'd be very interested in seeing your formal 
procedure. FWIW, I currently use TW to index all of the LDS microfilm scans 
with my ancestral records ... it would be great to be able to import a 
GEDCOM, display it, and cross-reference the record to the person, all in 
TW. 

Maybe I'll tackle that after I'm finished Cardo 1.0! ;->

Cheers,
David.


On Monday, 20 February 2017 11:10:49 UTC-5, Josiah wrote:
>
> It seems to me that genealogical trees should be doable in TW.
>
> I should emphasise I don't have the programming skill to actually do it.
>
> *But I thought others might find it an interesting delimited challenge.*
>
> WHY am I interested? Because I am an anthropologist. And anthropologists 
> know lots about kinship systems. And TW could serve as an elegant, 
> minimalist way to record and document kinship relationships, I believe.
>
> Kinship diagrams are in one way very easy. They are simply branching 
> hierarchies of "DESCENT". BUT also central to them is the role of 
> "AFFINITY" (marriage). 
>
> So what you have is a FUSION of DESCENT lines through MARRIAGE. So its 
> never ONE descent line.
>
> This is why Mat's interesting recent experiment using forking lists (<li>) 
> and smart CSS hits a limit. It can't cope with the  arbitrary crossing in 
> of affines (relatives by marriage) who create ADDITIONAL HIERARCHIES.
>
> I'm sure there could be a way to do this in TW without having to resort to 
> overly complex solutions. The logic in genealogical trees is not infinitely 
> complex.
>
> If anyone is interested I can layout a formal procedure for constructing 
> them anthropologists use.
>
> Technical note: Western style genealogical trees are generally presented 
> TOP DOWN from ancestors. Anthropologist work from "EGO", i.e. a specific 
> person and depict the relationships UP & DOWN from there. The final 
> diagrams are IDENTICAL, but the mode of construction is different. Its 
> perhaps worth noting that construction from "EGO" gives a very clear 
> procedure because its always determinate.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/72c81e8f-f448-4d68-aba4-e2bb47faf612%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to