at this point ff and chrome have implemented the new version of javascript, while pale moon is stuck in the past and will eventually stop working with new webpages. There is a long term support for ff (I have not tried it) which last for 12months and will be based on version 52 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Firefox_ESR
On Saturday, March 11, 2017 at 5:52:10 PM UTC, Mark S. wrote: > > People always think a new browser is faster, because they haven't loaded > it's cache and memory yet like the old. > > I used Pale Moon for awhile, but I found I got many more Red Screen Of > Embarrassment messages. It seemed to give them even for things it didn't > like in CSS settings, as if something in its memory was out of synch with > the rest of the file. > > Mark > > On Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 1:01:48 PM UTC-8, G.J.Robert wrote: >> >> I have switched to Vivaldi first, and than I found Pale Moon, which >> forked from Firefox and will keep XUL/XPCOM addon framework which will keep >> TiddlyFox alive. Also Pale Moon is much faster, energy/RAM-efficient than >> Firefox 28+. >> >> @TiddlyTweeter於 2017年3月9日星期四 UTC+8上午2時14分02秒寫道： >>> >>> The added value of FIREFOX for TiddlyWiki is really only the brilliant >>> TiddlyFox EXTENSION. It works really well. >>> >>> But the problem is its getting harder and harder to run it as Firefox >>> changes. >>> >>> Right now I'm using Firefox Developer Edition simply because it lets me >>> over-ride the strict signing rules to get Jeremy's perfectly innocent, >>> excellent, TW auto-save add-on, TiddlyFox, working. >>> >>> I think Mozilla are shooting themselves in the foot. Their lifeblood was >>> extensions. And the future for TW auto-saving via browsers currently looks >>> fragile. >>> >>> Best wishes >>> Josiah >>> >>> On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 18:38:53 UTC+1, Duarte Farrajota Ramos wrote: >>>> >>>> Those chrome extensions are great indeed. I am imagining it is >>>> something along the lines of Download Router Vivaldi will one day have >>>> built in. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately those extensions don't work with Vivaldi, at least from >>>> my testing I could not get Downloads Router to work. Although it is mostly >>>> chromium based it probably introduces enough changes in the downloads area >>>> that breaks those. >>>> Lets hope to see some improvements in that area in the future. >>>> >>>> For now I just use it as I did in Firefox, I don't have a default save >>>> location and just manually browse to the required directory and overwrite >>>> the file. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, 8 March 2017 14:43:17 UTC, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Chrome has these file SAVING EXTENSIONS that may be relevant, if they >>>>> work in Vivaldi: >>>>> >>>>> *Downloads Overwrite Existing Files*: >>>>> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/downloads-overwrite-exist/fkomnceojfhfkgjgcijfahmgeljomcfk >>>>> >>>>> *Downloads Router*: >>>>> https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/downloads-router/fgkboeogiiklpklnjgdiaghaiehcknjo >>>>> >>>>> What is really needed is a combination of the both in one. It would be >>>>> a close second to auto-save such as we have in Firefox via TiddlyFox. >>>>> >>>>> BTW, it was* Riz* who first alerted me to the Chrome extensions. >>>>> There may be more I don't know of. >>>>> >>>>> Best wishes >>>>> Josiah >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/a5c1bbac-db5f-4b1a-b820-232bac959b53%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
