On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 9:29:07 PM UTC+1, Jack Armitage wrote: > > Thanks for the replies everyone. It certainly seems doable! >
Yes. > @Pmario, we have not really proposed this as a definite change, and the > wiki would still stay on GitHub at least for now. We are interested in > options for having the wiki available in our environment though so > TiddlyWiki could be a possibility for that. > That's a good thing to read. I just wanted to be sure, that there is some discussion going on. > The benefit that I see is that each user could then edit this base wiki to > make it their own and document their projects, and potentially contribute > back to the main wiki. > As I wrote, that should be possible too. ... But I'm not sure, how you would want to implement it. .. IMO for a "low latency" system, it's important, that only the stuff that's really needed is running. ... So the final workflow, will need to be discussed. -mario -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c7f8bfe0-d5bd-4f4e-be13-572aadf29b27%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
